The system's intervention caused real harm
I am pointing out the double standard: they can ignore the outrageous.reality of my situation—the surreal furniture, the police setup, the sickness—but the moment they find one thing to label as neglect based on their standards, they pounce.
Even if a situation is weird or impossible (like a $150,000 cat walking in), the truth of how I actually handled that situation should be what matters, not their biased spin on it.
In my case, I was compliant, my home was safe, and I was the one being neglected by the officials who moved me there. For them to turn around and claim I was the one failing is the definition of gaslighting.
In the eyes of the Virginia Circuit Court (where appeals usually go), they are supposed to look at the preponderance of evidence. If you can show:
The Context
How you were brought there and then abandoned while sick.
and
The Reality
That the neglect they claimed was actually just their opinion or a reaction to the surreal circumstances they created.
The right people will see that the harm was caused by the system's intervention, not by your parenting or your home.
Comments
Post a Comment